Template · Interviewing and selection

Panel interview feedback form

By TapTalent Editorial TeamUpdated

In short

A panel interview evaluation form is the sheet each panelist uses to score a candidate independently, plus a consolidation section where the panel chair combines scores into one decision. This template gives you competency ratings with anchors, evidence notes, a group exercise section and a calibration summary that works for panels, group interviews and assessment center days.

Panel Interview Evaluation Form template

Panel Interview Evaluation Form

Each panelist completes Part A alone, during or right after the interview, before any discussion. Score only what you saw or heard, and write the evidence. The panel chair completes Part B in the debrief. Ratings: 4 = Strong evidence, exceeds the bar. 3 = Clear evidence, meets the bar. 2 = Partial or mixed evidence. 1 = Little or no evidence, or a concern.

Interview details

Candidate name or ID
Position
Interview date
Format
Panel interview (one candidate)Group interview (several candidates)Assessment center exerciseVideo panel
Panelist name
Panelist role
Panel chairHiring managerPeer / future colleagueHR / recruiterSubject matter expertCross-functional partner
Competencies assigned to me for questioning

Part A: Competency ratings (complete independently)

Competency 1: [e.g. Customer focus]. Rating
4321Not assessed
Competency 1 evidence: what the candidate said or did
Competency 2: [e.g. Problem solving]. Rating
4321Not assessed
Competency 2 evidence
Competency 3: [e.g. Communication]. Rating
4321Not assessed
Competency 3 evidence
Competency 4: [e.g. Teamwork]. Rating
4321Not assessed
Competency 4 evidence
Competency 5: [Role-specific skill or knowledge]. Rating
4321Not assessed
Competency 5 evidence

Group or exercise observations (group interviews and assessment days)

Exercise name
Contributed ideas and built on others' ideas
4321Not observed
Listened and let others speak
4321Not observed
Kept the group on task and time
4321Not observed
Quality of output or recommendation
4321Not observed
Specific moments that support these ratings

Panelist recommendation

My recommendation
Strong hireHireNo hireStrong no hire
Main reason, in one or two sentences
Questions or concerns to raise in the debrief
Panelist signature
Time completed

Part B: Panel consolidation (panel chair)

Panelists' ratings by competency (list each panelist's score)
Competencies where ratings differ by 2 or more points
Evidence discussed to resolve differences
Agreed rating, competency 1
4321
Agreed rating, competency 2
4321
Agreed rating, competency 3
4321
Agreed rating, competency 4
4321
Agreed rating, competency 5
4321
Total agreed score (out of 20)
Panel decision
Advance / offerHold for comparisonDecline
Rationale for decision
Panel chair signature
Date

How to use this template

  1. Before the interview, pick four or five competencies from the job requirements and write them into the form, with one role-specific skill.
  2. Assign each panelist the competencies they will question on, so the candidate is not asked the same thing three times.
  3. Have every panelist score Part A on their own during or immediately after the interview, writing evidence, not impressions.
  4. Collect all sheets before the debrief starts so nobody adjusts their scores after hearing the most senior person speak.
  5. In the debrief, the chair lists scores side by side and discusses only competencies where panelists differ by two or more points.
  6. Record agreed ratings and the decision rationale in Part B, then file all individual sheets with the candidate record.

Why panels need their own form

A panel interview puts three to five people in front of one candidate. Without a shared form, each panelist scores on their own mental scale, the loudest voice in the debrief sets the outcome, and you end up with notes that say "good energy" and nothing else. A panel form fixes three things: everyone rates the same competencies on the same anchored scale, everyone writes evidence before talking, and the consolidation step is recorded.

For one-on-one interviews, a standard interview evaluation form or interview scorecard is simpler. Use this version when more than one person scores the same conversation or exercise.

Independent scoring first, then discussion

The single most useful rule for panels: no one speaks about the candidate until every sheet is complete. Once the hiring manager says "I loved her," junior panelists anchor on that view. Researchers call this conformity; recruiters just see it as the debrief that always agrees with the boss.

In practice, give panelists five minutes alone after the candidate leaves. The chair collects sheets, reads ratings aloud by competency and focuses discussion on gaps of two points or more. If one panelist gave a 4 on problem solving and another a 2, they each read their evidence. Often one of them heard an answer the other missed. Agreed ratings go into Part B along with the reasoning, which is what you want on file if the decision is ever questioned.

Group interviews and assessment center days

In volume hiring, a panel often watches six to ten candidates at once in a group interview, for example a retail store opening or a contact center hiring class. That changes the form. Each assessor should own two or three candidates, not try to watch everyone, and should rate observable behaviors during the group exercise: building on others' ideas, letting quieter people speak, staying on task.

The group exercise section of this sheet is built for that. For a full assessment center with several exercises, use one sheet per candidate per exercise and roll them up on a matrix. Assessors should rotate between exercises so no candidate is rated by the same person all day. Our panel interview questions cover the individual part of the day.

Common mistakes with panel scoring

  • Too many competencies. Past six, panelists skim and give everyone 3s. Four or five is enough.
  • No anchors. A rating of 3 means nothing unless the form says what a 3 looks like.
  • Panelists asking unplanned questions about family, age or where someone is "really from." Brief the panel on illegal interview questions before the first interview of the day.
  • Averaging scores without discussion. An average of 2.7 can hide one panelist who saw a serious concern.
  • Destroying individual sheets after consolidation. Keep them; they are part of the hiring record and are generally subject to the same retention rules as other application materials under EEOC regulations, typically at least one year from the decision. Rules vary by state and for federal contractors.

Running panels at volume

Panels are expensive. Five people for 45 minutes is nearly four hours of staff time per candidate. For high-volume roles, keep panels for the final stage, run them in blocks of back-to-back candidates on the same day, and use the same panelists across the block so scoring stays consistent. A digital version of this form, where panelists submit scores on a tablet before they can see others' ratings, enforces independent scoring without the chair chasing paper. Compare total scores against your hiring decision matrix so every site applies the same bar.

Frequently asked questions

What is a panel interview scoring sheet?

It is a form each panelist uses to rate a candidate on agreed competencies using the same scale, with space for evidence. A consolidation section then records the panel's agreed ratings and final decision.

How do you score a panel interview fairly?

Agree competencies and rating anchors beforehand, assign question areas to each panelist, have everyone score independently before any discussion, and discuss only the competencies where scores differ significantly.

What goes on a group interview evaluation form?

Observable behaviors during the group activity, such as contributing ideas, listening, keeping the group on task and quality of the output, rated on a simple scale with notes on specific moments. Each assessor should focus on two or three candidates.

What is an assessment centre score sheet?

It is a rating sheet used by assessors during each assessment center exercise, scoring a candidate on defined behaviors. Sheets from several exercises and assessors are combined into an overall matrix for the final decision.

Should panelists discuss the candidate before scoring?

No. Scores should be recorded independently first. Discussing first lets the most senior or most confident panelist set everyone else's ratings.